Fund Manager Quality Rating Introduction Fund manager quality rating is a forward-looking assessment of a fund manager’s investment management capabilities and strength of its operational platform. Fund management industry facilitates investments for cross-section of individual a
Content register
Beacon Ratings Financial Sector
Fund Manager Quality Rating Introduction Fund manager quality rating is a forward-looking assessment of a fund manager’s investment management capabilities and strength of its operational platform. Fund management industry facilitates investments for cross-section of individual and institutional investors, playing key role in capital market intermediation: participating in initial public offerings and private placements, equity and debt capital, and managing collective investment schemes and oth
Fund Manager Quality Rating
Introduction
Fund manager quality rating is a forward-looking assessment of a fund manager’s investment management capabilities and strength of its operational platform. Fund management industry facilitates investments for cross-section of individual and institutional investors, playing key role in capital market intermediation: participating in initial public offerings and private placements, equity and debt capital, and managing collective investment schemes and other related schemes. Fund managers acts as agents of their clients, responsible for implementing investing strategies and making investment decisions in accordance with stated investment objectives.
Rating criteria
The criteria for assessing fund managers focuses on quality of investment expertise, robustness of portfolio management, risk culture, tolerance and risk management infrastructure processes, track record, competence and skills of senior management, governance arrangements and client services management of marketing personnel. Rating factors include:
Business model
The business model assessment is to determine the stability of investment manager’s business, inherent risks that may threaten the viability of operations, market opportunities, and robustness of business models to sustain competitive market dynamics and unstable markets. Factors assessed include:
Nature of clients
Products
Target markets
Distribution channels
Strategic alliances with other providers
Market position
Market position focuses on the aggregate size of funds under management and penetration in the market over time. Diversification of products and services contribute to growth and sustainability of fee revenue. Complementary products provide for earnings diversification and distribution channels. International investments exposure creates added advantage to increasing their market share. Factors assessed include:
Market share of funds under management
Investors distribution in retail, corporate and others
Diversification of investment products and services
Complementary products and services
International investment portfolio
Portfolio management process
Fund manager’s processes, strategies, policies, procedures, controls and monitoring systems’ responsiveness to changes in client needs and capital markets conditions are critical elements for measuring portfolio management quality. Well-developed investment policy is fundamental to portfolio management risk control and disciplined investment management. The investment policy determines the asset classes that can be represented in the portfolio, allocation among asset categories and rebalancing limits for allocations. The investment policy specifies constraints and restrictions on assets, such as liquidity, marketability requirements, and diversification concentrations. The following factors are assessed:
Portfolio management processes
Investment infrastructure scalability
Investment policy guidelines
Investment policy implementation
Performance measurement and reporting
Composition of investment committee
Investment committee decision making process
Investment research
Risk management process
Risk management processes, practices and regulatory compliance are assessed. Fund manager’s framework for identifying and measuring risks including market, operational, credit and liquidity risk and personnel responsibilities towards risks are also assessed. Risk estimation techniques such as value at risk, default risk analysis etc. and processes employed to monitor and control risks including scenario analysis, stress testing, internally defined limits for exposures are assessed. The quality of oversight provided by board of directors, risk committee, management information, regulatory ccompliance and internal audit function are assessed.
Risk identification
Risk measurement
Risk monitoring
Risk control
Risk mitigation
Regulatory risk compliance
Internal audit role
Fund performance
The fund performance and track record of a fund manager provides insight into its capability to deliver a consistent and repeatable performance and to maintain competitive fund performance vis-à-vis its peers and established benchmarks with similar portfolio objectives and risk tolerance standards. Risk-adjusted returns and performance attribution analyses provide greater insight into the relative performance of investment portfolios.
Portfolio rates of total return
Portfolio total return breakdown and attribution
Achieved portfolio objectives against established benchmarks
Portfolio risk-adjusted returns
Financial performance
Financial performance of fund managers provides information about financial strength to remain well-resourced to support business growth and adapt to changes in its operating environment and regulatory requirements. Sound financial performance and cash flow position and capital buffers over and above the regulatory minimum capital situates the fund manager to effectively deliver on clients’ mandates. Factors assesses include:
Growth of funds under management
Revenue mix
Operating margins
Return on equity
Return on assets
Cost to income
Liquidity position
Parent entity support
The parent entity understanding the fund management business, financial strength, extent of commitment to the business, and potential conflict of interest between the fund manager and parent entity. Financially sound parent entity supports fund manager in times of distress. Although not contractually required, parent entity may be obliged on account of reputational considerations to support. Factors assess include:
Parent entity’s stature and reputation in the market
Parent entity’s net-worth relative to funds under management
Extent of commitment to fund manager
Transparency and disclosures
Disclosure of cost structure, portfolio composition and method for computing net asset value (NAV) are key to achieving transparency with investors. NAV is the worth of investors’ net asset at a particular date, thus an important indicator of investment performance, which should not only be consistent with regulatory guidelines, but should also conform with industry best practices. Beacon Ratings assesses the following key factors includes:
Disclosure of cost structure
Disclosure of assets/entities invested
Disclosure of portfolio composition
Disclosure of method of calculating net asset value
Client service quality
The promptness in processing sale/repurchase requests, responding to investor grievances, proper and timely crediting of investment returns such as dividends and bonuses provides confidence in investors.Furthermore, fund manager’s marketing, distribution and clients service activities are important indicators of clients’ service standards. The use of multiple distribution channels maximises sales potentials and increases funds under management.
Promptness in processing sale
Promptness in repurchase requests
Response time to investor grievances
Proper crediting of returns on investment
Timely crediting of returns on investment
Distribution channels
Quality of service delivery
Corporate governance
Governance structure in terms of competence and strategic implementation to grow and defend clients’ investments.
Board independence
Governance structures
Board committees
Board oversight responsibilities
Management quality
Senior management’s capacity to effectively execute strategies and protect investors funds. Factors include:
Statutory compliance reports
Management stability
Management track record
Management pro-activeness
Line management’s track record
Management’s appetite for risk
Senior management succession planning
Fund manager quality rating scale
Imported table
Rating scale
Interpretation of rating scale
FMQR-1
Fund manager has superior fund management processes and risk management practices relative to size and complexity of its fund management activities, and very low vulnerability to financial or operational failure.
FMQR-2
Fund manager has very good fund management processes and risk management practices relative to the size and complexity of its fund management activities, and low vulnerability to financial or operational failure.
FMQR-3
Fund manager has good fund management processes and risk management practices relative to the size and complexity of its fund management activities, and moderately low vulnerability to financial or operational failure.
FMQR-4
Fund manager has adequate fund management processes and risk management practices relative to the size and complexity of its fund management activities, and moderate vulnerability to financial or operational failure.
FMQR-5
Fund manager has inadequate fund management processes and risk management practices relative to the size and complexity of its fund management activities, and high vulnerability to financial or operational failure.